🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that indecision on how best to tackle the issue is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being engulfed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue sets out a series of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure sites. Authorities maintain it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves looking for treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Further up the coast is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while working abroad. His mother said she lost sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to think this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Certainty

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Some want more coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to proceed for now. Different voices contend the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that process with communities.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the options. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires good local conversations to find the right answers for each community.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was described as one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, offering a theological perspective on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.